Over at Modern Art Notes, Tyler Green interviews Olga Viso (Part 1 and Part 2), raising some interesting questions about the preservation of art. The question has become more challenging as more and more artists create work that is inextricably tied to a specific location or, even worse, that is intentionally ephemeral. How do the museums and archives weigh respect for the (ephemeral, site specific) nature of the art against the cultural value of bringing it to a wider audience? One question that comes to my mind as I read the interview is whether certain kinds of art should not be documented at all. Of course this is an idea most curators and critics will be reluctant to entertain, but perhaps there is value in letting an artistic statement wither and fade as the context that birthed it recedes into the past.